Re: [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread Zefan Li
On 2015/2/28 1:08, Rik van Riel wrote: > Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. > Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Acked-by: Zefan Li -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Rik van Riel wrote: > Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. > Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Acked-by: David Rientjes -- To unsubscribe from

[PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread Rik van Riel
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra --- Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 10 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread Zefan Li
On 2015/2/28 1:08, Rik van Riel wrote: Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org Acked-by: Zefan Li

[PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread Rik van Riel
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org --- Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 10 -- 1 file

Re: [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets isolcpus

2015-02-27 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Rik van Riel wrote: Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus. Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code... Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org Acked-by: David