On 2015/2/28 1:08, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
> Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
Acked-by: Zefan Li
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
> Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
Acked-by: David Rientjes
--
To unsubscribe from
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
---
Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On 2015/2/28 1:08, Rik van Riel wrote:
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
Acked-by: Zefan Li
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
---
Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 10 --
1 file
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Rik van Riel wrote:
Document the subtly changed relationship between cpusets and isolcpus.
Turns out the old documentation did not quite match the code...
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
Acked-by: David
6 matches
Mail list logo