On 26/01/15 15:07, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote:
>>> New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have
>>> LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as
>>> RE
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote:
>> New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have
>> LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as
>> RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision
Hi,
On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote:
> New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have
> LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as
> RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core
> (despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for e
New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have
LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as
RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core
(despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for earlier SoCs).
According to OMAP5 TRM: "Nonmultiplexed
4 matches
Mail list logo