ring buffer implementation hid_debug_event() is strange allowing a lost
of data. it does not move head pointer on append and uses per-byte for()
loop. fix this by introducing a new ring buffer implementation, which
overwrites the oldest data in case of the ring buffer overflow. it uses
some calculations for the buffer pointers but only 2 or less memcpy()
calls.

Signed-off-by: Vladis Dronov <vdro...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-debug.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
index de640e4132c7..63247ac4a9ce 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
@@ -661,20 +661,70 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_dump_device);
 /* enqueue string to 'events' ring buffer */
 void hid_debug_event(struct hid_device *hdev, char *buf)
 {
-       unsigned i;
        struct hid_debug_list *list;
-       unsigned long flags, flags2;
+       unsigned long flags1, flags2;
+       unsigned int part1, part2;
+       size_t len;
 
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&hdev->debug_list_lock, flags);
+       if (!buf || !buf[0])
+               return;
+
+       len = strlen(buf);
+
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&hdev->debug_list_lock, flags1);
        list_for_each_entry(list, &hdev->debug_list, node) {
                spin_lock_irqsave(&list->list_lock, flags2);
-               for (i = 0; buf[i]; i++)
-                       list->hid_debug_buf[(list->tail + i) % 
HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE] =
-                               buf[i];
-               list->tail = (list->tail + i) % HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE;
+
+               /* len >= BUFSIZE, copy the last HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE-1 bytes */
+               if (len > HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE - 1) {
+                       memcpy(list->hid_debug_buf,
+                               buf + len - (HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE - 1),
+                               HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE - 1);
+
+                       list->head = 0;
+                       list->tail = HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE - 1;
+               } else {
+                       /* append data to the ring buffer */
+                       part1 = min_t(size_t, HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE - list->tail,
+                                       len);
+                       part2 = len - part1;
+
+                       memcpy(list->hid_debug_buf + list->tail, buf, part1);
+
+                       /* check if head must be moved as the ring is full */
+                       if ((list->tail < list->head) &&
+                           (list->tail + part1 >= list->head)) {
+                               list->head = list->tail + part1 + 1;
+
+                               if (list->head >= HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE)
+                                       list->head -= HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE;
+                       }
+
+                       /* set tail after the end of appended data */
+                       list->tail = list->tail + part1;
+                       if (list->tail == HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE) {
+                               list->tail = 0;
+                               if (list->head == 0)
+                                       list->head = 1;
+                       }
+
+                       /* append the 2nd part of data to the ring */
+                       if (part2 > 0) {
+                               memcpy(list->hid_debug_buf, buf + part1, part2);
+
+                               /* check if head must be moved again as
+                                * the ring is full
+                                */
+                               if (list->tail + part2 >= list->head)
+                                       list->head = list->tail + part2 + 1;
+
+                               list->tail = list->tail + part2;
+                       }
+               }
+
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->list_lock, flags2);
        }
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hdev->debug_list_lock, flags);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hdev->debug_list_lock, flags1);
 
        wake_up_interruptible(&hdev->debug_wait);
 }
-- 
2.19.0

Reply via email to