Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dma-buf: Add an API for importing and exporting sync files (v5)

2021-03-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:11 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:55 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:39:06AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On 2020-03-17 10:21 p.m., Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > Explicit synchronization is the future. At least, t

Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dma-buf: Add an API for importing and exporting sync files (v5)

2021-03-15 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:55 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:39:06AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2020-03-17 10:21 p.m., Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > Explicit synchronization is the future. At least, that seems to be what > > > most userspace APIs are agreeing on at th

Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dma-buf: Add an API for importing and exporting sync files (v5)

2020-09-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:39:06AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 2020-03-17 10:21 p.m., Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > Explicit synchronization is the future. At least, that seems to be what > > most userspace APIs are agreeing on at this point. However, most of our > > Linux APIs (both userspace a

Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dma-buf: Add an API for importing and exporting sync files (v5)

2020-09-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 2020-03-17 10:21 p.m., Jason Ekstrand wrote: Explicit synchronization is the future. At least, that seems to be what most userspace APIs are agreeing on at this point. However, most of our Linux APIs (both userspace and kernel UAPI) are currently built around implicit synchronization with dm