Re: [PATCH 3/3] Test softlockup

2019-10-21 Thread Petr Mladek
On Mon 2019-10-21 14:45:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Trigger busy loop by: > > $> cat /proc/version > > > > Stop the busy loop by: > > $> cat /proc/consoles > > > > The code also shows the first touch*watchdog() function that hides >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Test softlockup

2019-10-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Trigger busy loop by: > $> cat /proc/version > > Stop the busy loop by: > $> cat /proc/consoles > > The code also shows the first touch*watchdog() function that hides > softlockup on a "well known" location. This seems like a terribl

[PATCH 3/3] Test softlockup

2019-08-19 Thread Petr Mladek
Trigger busy loop by: $> cat /proc/version Stop the busy loop by: $> cat /proc/consoles The code also shows the first touch*watchdog() function that hides softlockup on a "well known" location. Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek --- fs/proc/consoles.c | 5 + fs/proc/version.c | 7 +++ kerne

[PATCH 3/3] Test softlockup

2019-06-05 Thread Petr Mladek
Trigger busy loop by: $> cat /proc/version Stop the busy loop by: $> cat /proc/console The code also shows the first touch*watchdog() function that hides softlockup on a "well known" location. Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek --- fs/proc/consoles.c | 5 + fs/proc/version.c | 7 +++ kernel