On 02/10/2018 12:57 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:41 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
I assume you are referring to this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10194819/
.. which is now:
commit 904e14fb7cb9 ("KVM: VMX: make MSR bitmaps per-VCPU")
right?
If this is the case, then
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:41 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> I assume you are referring to this:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10194819/
>
> .. which is now:
>
> commit 904e14fb7cb9 ("KVM: VMX: make MSR bitmaps per-VCPU")
>
> right?
>
> If this is the case, then I do not see where the MSR_B
On 02/10/2018 12:26 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
... otherwise we will just be running with the L1 MSR BITMAP!
It does not seem that we ever update the MSR_BITMAP when the nested guest
is running. The only place where we update the MSR_BITMAP f
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> ... otherwise we will just be running with the L1 MSR BITMAP!
>
> It does not seem that we ever update the MSR_BITMAP when the nested guest
> is running. The only place where we update the MSR_BITMAP field in VMCS is
> for the L1 guest!
>
>
... otherwise we will just be running with the L1 MSR BITMAP!
It does not seem that we ever update the MSR_BITMAP when the nested guest
is running. The only place where we update the MSR_BITMAP field in VMCS is
for the L1 guest!
Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Radim Krčmář
5 matches
Mail list logo