Hi Heiko, Doug
在 2016年12月17日 01:28, Doug Anderson 写道:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Xing Zheng wrote:
Hi Heiko, Doug,
On 2016年12月16日 02:18, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016, 08:34:09 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
I still need to digest all of the things that wer
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016, 14:57:01 CET schrieb Xing Zheng:
> Hi Heiko, Doug,
>
> On 2016年12月16日 02:18, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016, 08:34:09 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> I still need to digest all of the things that were added to this
> >> thread overnight, b
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Xing Zheng wrote:
> Hi Heiko, Doug,
>
> On 2016年12月16日 02:18, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016, 08:34:09 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
>
>
> I still need to digest all of the things that were added to this
> thread overnight, but nothin
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016, 08:34:09 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Frank Wang
wrote:
> > Hi Brain, Doug and Heiko,
> >
> > I would like to summarize why this story was constructed.
> >
> > The ehci/ohci-platform suspend process are blocked due to
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
> Hi Brain, Doug and Heiko,
>
> I would like to summarize why this story was constructed.
>
> The ehci/ohci-platform suspend process are blocked due to UTMI clock which
> directly output from usb-phy has been disabled, and why the UTMI clock
Hi Brain, Doug and Heiko,
I would like to summarize why this story was constructed.
The ehci/ohci-platform suspend process are blocked due to UTMI clock
which directly output from usb-phy has been disabled, and why the UTMI
clock was disabled?
UTMI clock and 480m clock all output from the sa
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:41:04AM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
> // Frank
>
> Hi Doug, Brain,
> Thanks for the reply.
> Sorry I forgot these patches have been sent earlier, and Frank
> have some explained and discussed with Heiko.
> Please see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9255245/
>
// Frank
Hi Doug, Brain,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry I forgot these patches have been sent earlier, and Frank have
some explained and discussed with Heiko.
Please see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9255245/
Perhaps we can move to that patch tree to continue the discussion.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:10:38PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Xing Zheng
> > wrote:
> > > From: William wu
> > >
> > > We found that the suspend process was blocked when it run into
> > > ehci/o
Hi,
I think Doug is probably right on most accounts, and I haven't
thoroughly investigated all the claims. But a few thoughts:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:10:38PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Xing Zheng wrote:
> > From: William wu
> >
> > We found that the suspe
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Xing Zheng wrote:
> From: William wu
>
> We found that the suspend process was blocked when it run into
> ehci/ohci module due to clk-480m of usb2-phy was disabled.
>
> The root cause is that usb2-phy suspended earlier than ehci/ohci
> (usb2-phy will be auto
From: William wu
We found that the suspend process was blocked when it run into
ehci/ohci module due to clk-480m of usb2-phy was disabled.
The root cause is that usb2-phy suspended earlier than ehci/ohci
(usb2-phy will be auto suspended if no devices plug-in). and the
clk-480m provided by it was
12 matches
Mail list logo
