On 10/11/2013 06:44 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
>>>
>>> No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
> >
> > No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function.
>
> OK, thank you for your
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function.
OK, thank you for your confirmation.
On 10/11/2013 06:44 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function.
On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
> >> atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use
On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>> In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
>> atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
>> 'atomic_t', so need match s390's
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
> atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
> 'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> ---
>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int'
On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(),
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 7
In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h | 13 +++--
1
14 matches
Mail list logo