Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-28 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Alban, [auto build test ERROR on mtd/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.10 next-20170228] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-28 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Alban, [auto build test ERROR on mtd/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.10 next-20170228] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Alban
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:13:21 +0100 Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! I first wanted to be sure that the devdata part was generally acceptable, this patch was just included as an example of a user. But it sound like that part will have to move to nvmem

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Alban
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:13:21 +0100 Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! I first wanted to be sure that the devdata part was generally acceptable, this patch was just included as an example of a user. But it sound like that part will have to move to nvmem first. I'll come

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 27 February 2017 at 23:48, Alban wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:13:21 +0100 > Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! > > I first wanted to be sure that the devdata part was generally > acceptable, this patch was just included as an

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 27 February 2017 at 23:48, Alban wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:13:21 +0100 > Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! > > I first wanted to be sure that the devdata part was generally > acceptable, this patch was just included as an example of a user. > But it sound

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! On 27 February 2017 at 21:28, Alban wrote: > @@ -513,6 +515,43 @@ static void ath9k_eeprom_release(struct ath_softc *sc) > release_firmware(sc->sc_ah->eeprom_blob); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +static int ath9k_init_of(struct ath_softc

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Why you didn't cc linux-wireless?!?! On 27 February 2017 at 21:28, Alban wrote: > @@ -513,6 +515,43 @@ static void ath9k_eeprom_release(struct ath_softc *sc) > release_firmware(sc->sc_ah->eeprom_blob); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +static int ath9k_init_of(struct ath_softc *sc) > +{ > +

[PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Alban
From: Alban Bedel Allow registering ath9k AHB devices defined in OF. The binding currently only allow to set the MAC address and to optionally disable the 2GHz or 5GHz band. The EEPROM data is loaded using the device data API. Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel ---

[PATCH 3/3] ath9k: ahb: Add OF support

2017-02-27 Thread Alban
From: Alban Bedel Allow registering ath9k AHB devices defined in OF. The binding currently only allow to set the MAC address and to optionally disable the 2GHz or 5GHz band. The EEPROM data is loaded using the device data API. Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel ---