On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Ick, no. Pulled back out, as it doesn't even compile :(
>
Ick, indeed. Yet another victim of my sneaky attempt to whack one large
patch up into three small patches. Let's just forget this patch ever
existed, since it doesn't add any new functionality an
>On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 12:38:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>Ick, no. Pulled back out, as it doesn't even compile :(
>
Agreed. Ick. Not necessary at all, so please drop this one on the
floor.
-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 12:38:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 02:55:09PM -0800, Mitch Williams wrote:
> > This patch reverses the semantics of the read fill flag, getting rid of an
> > extra assignment at allocation time.
> >
> > Generated from 2.6.11-rc1.
> >
> > Signed-off-
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 02:55:09PM -0800, Mitch Williams wrote:
> This patch reverses the semantics of the read fill flag, getting rid of an
> extra assignment at allocation time.
>
> Generated from 2.6.11-rc1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
-
T
This patch reverses the semantics of the read fill flag, getting rid of an
extra assignment at allocation time.
Generated from 2.6.11-rc1.
Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.11-clean/fs/sysfs/file.c
linux-2.6.11/fs/sysfs/file.c
--- linux-2.6.11-c
5 matches
Mail list logo