Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Simplify core code related to boost support

2015-12-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27-12-15, 00:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is > redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left > unset if "boost" is not supported. Moreover, the only driver > populating the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Simplify core code related to boost support

2015-12-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27-12-15, 00:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is > redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left > unset if "boost" is not supported. Moreover, the only

[PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Simplify core code related to boost support

2015-12-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left unset if "boost" is not supported. Moreover, the only driver populating the ->set_boost callback is acpi_cpufreq, so make it avoid

[PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Simplify core code related to boost support

2015-12-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left unset if "boost" is not supported. Moreover, the only driver populating the ->set_boost callback is