Those hooks implement the exact same behavior as the default hooks by
gpiolib, so there is no point in having a duplicated definition in
gpio-dwapb.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@bootlin.com>
---
Note: this commit was only build tested.
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c | 25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
index 982e699a5b81..e27c56854ee7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
@@ -98,29 +98,6 @@ static void em_gio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
        em_gio_write(p, GIO_IEN, BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d)));
 }
 
-static int em_gio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
-{
-       struct em_gio_priv *p = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-       int ret;
-
-       ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&p->gpio_chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
-       if (ret) {
-               dev_err(p->gpio_chip.parent,
-                       "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
-                       irqd_to_hwirq(d));
-               return ret;
-       }
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static void em_gio_irq_relres(struct irq_data *d)
-{
-       struct em_gio_priv *p = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-
-       gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&p->gpio_chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
-}
-
-
 #define GIO_ASYNC(x) (x + 8)
 
 static unsigned char em_gio_sense_table[IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK + 1] = {
@@ -344,8 +321,6 @@ static int em_gio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        irq_chip->irq_mask = em_gio_irq_disable;
        irq_chip->irq_unmask = em_gio_irq_enable;
        irq_chip->irq_set_type = em_gio_irq_set_type;
-       irq_chip->irq_request_resources = em_gio_irq_reqres;
-       irq_chip->irq_release_resources = em_gio_irq_relres;
        irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
 
        p->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(pdev->dev.of_node, ngpios, 0,
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to