Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
>> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the
>> inactive
>> list".
>
> Actually that
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
to have used HIGH_ORDER in lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the
inactive
list.
Actually that doesn't matter,
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the
> inactive
> list".
Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:04:36 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The memory allocator treats lower order (order <= 3) and higher order
> (order >= 4) allocations in slightly different ways. As lower orders
> are much more likely to be available and also more likely to be
> simply
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:04:36 +0100 Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The memory allocator treats lower order (order = 3) and higher order
(order = 4) allocations in slightly different ways. As lower orders
are much more likely to be available and also more likely to be
simply reclaimed
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
to have used HIGH_ORDER in lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the
inactive
list.
Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping
The memory allocator treats lower order (order <= 3) and higher order
(order >= 4) allocations in slightly different ways. As lower orders
are much more likely to be available and also more likely to be
simply reclaimed it is deemed reasonable to wait longer for those.
Lumpy reclaim also changes
The memory allocator treats lower order (order = 3) and higher order
(order = 4) allocations in slightly different ways. As lower orders
are much more likely to be available and also more likely to be
simply reclaimed it is deemed reasonable to wait longer for those.
Lumpy reclaim also changes
8 matches
Mail list logo
