On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> If you're OK with this and the previous patch, I'll squash those into
> the original ones, and put it on a branch for Thomas to pick up for 4.5.
OK go ahead.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
On 23/10/15 23:15, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Instead of having the irqchip being a static struct, make it part
> of the per-instance data so we can assign it a dynamic name. This
> has the usable side effect of displaying the GIC with an instance
> number as GIC0, GIC1 ... GICn in /proc/interrupts, wh
Instead of having the irqchip being a static struct, make it part
of the per-instance data so we can assign it a dynamic name. This
has the usable side effect of displaying the GIC with an instance
number as GIC0, GIC1 ... GICn in /proc/interrupts, which is helpful
when debugging cascaded GICs, suc
3 matches
Mail list logo