Hi,
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On 2017/9/28 4:56, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> This attempts to instill a bit of paranoia to the code dealing with
>> the CTO timer. It's believed that this will make the CTO timer more
>> robust in the case that we're having
Hi Doug,
On 2017/9/28 4:56, Douglas Anderson wrote:
This attempts to instill a bit of paranoia to the code dealing with
the CTO timer. It's believed that this will make the CTO timer more
robust in the case that we're having very long interrupt latencies.
I have already got reports about the
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This attempts to instill a bit of paranoia to the code dealing with
> the CTO timer. It's believed that this will make the CTO timer more
> robust in the case that we're having very long interrupt latencies.
>
> Note that I originall
This attempts to instill a bit of paranoia to the code dealing with
the CTO timer. It's believed that this will make the CTO timer more
robust in the case that we're having very long interrupt latencies.
Note that I originally thought that perhaps this patch was being
overly paranoid and wasn't r
4 matches
Mail list logo