Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-05 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 05/09/18 13:12, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM Mark Cave-Ayland > wrote: >> >> On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: >> >>> On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any FDT and modern

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-05 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 05/09/18 13:12, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM Mark Cave-Ayland > wrote: >> >> On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: >> >>> On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any FDT and modern

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-05 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > > On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any > >> FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-05 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > > On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any > >> FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-04 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: >> Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any >> FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the >> OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-04 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 05/09/18 02:55, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: >> Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any >> FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the >> OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-04 Thread Frank Rowand
On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: > Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any > FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the > OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any outside > users. > > This also gets us one

Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-09-04 Thread Frank Rowand
On 08/30/18 12:05, Rob Herring wrote: > Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any > FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the > OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any outside > users. > > This also gets us one

[PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-08-30 Thread Rob Herring
Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any outside users. This also gets us one step closer to removing the asm/prom.h dependency on

[PATCH 3/3] of: make default address and size cells sizes private

2018-08-30 Thread Rob Herring
Only some old OpenFirmware implementations rely on default sizes. Any FDT and modern implementation should have explicit properties. Make the OF_ROOT_NODE_*_CELLS_DEFAULT defines private so we don't get any outside users. This also gets us one step closer to removing the asm/prom.h dependency on