Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Kukjin
>
>
>
Oops, sorry.
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> Tomasz,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Tomasz Figa
> wrote:
> >> >> > BTW, probably we need a similar fixing in the mach-exynos/common.c
> >>
Kukjin
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Tomasz,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> >> > BTW, probably we need a similar fixing in the mach-exynos/common.c
>> >> > file
>> >> > before pinct기 for distro...
>> >>
>> >> Is an
Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Tomasz,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> > BTW, probably we need a similar fixing in the mach-exynos/common.c
> >> > file
> >> > before pinct기 for distro...
> >>
> >> Is anyone using the functions in mach-exynos/common.c file anymore? I
> >>
Tomasz,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> > BTW, probably we need a similar fixing in the mach-exynos/common.c
>> > file
>> > before pinct기 for distro...
>>
>> Is anyone using the functions in mach-exynos/common.c file anymore? I
>> thought that non-dt exynos support was goi
On Thursday 13 of June 2013 09:38:33 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Kukjin,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Kukjin Kim
wrote:
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> >> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
On Thursday 13 of June 2013 09:34:43 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Tomasz Figa
wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 10:33:19 Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> >> becomes inac
Kukjin,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
>> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
>> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling t
Tomasz,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 10:33:19 Doug Anderson wrote:
>> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
>> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
>> will be immedia
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
> handler is not enough.
>
> Si
Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
> handler is not enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato
>
Hi Doug,
On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 10:33:19 Doug Anderson wrote:
> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
> handler is not e
A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
handler is not enough.
Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson
---
dr
12 matches
Mail list logo
