On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:52:18PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > Then again, I suppose anything without rq->lock can and will miss tasks.
>
> If we use rq->lock it's possible to move check_for_tasks() to
> kernel/sched/core.c.
>
> And we can leave TASK_RUNNING check for waking tasks. Maybe some
В Пн, 23/06/2014 в 12:24 +0200, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:22PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >
> > 1)Iterate throw all of threads in the system.
>
> thru
Thanks :)
>
> > Check for all threads, not only for group leaders.
> >
> > 2)Check for p->on_rq instead
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:22PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> 1)Iterate throw all of threads in the system.
thru
> Check for all threads, not only for group leaders.
>
> 2)Check for p->on_rq instead of p->state and cputime.
> Preempted task in !TASK_RUNNING state OR just
> cr
1)Iterate throw all of threads in the system.
Check for all threads, not only for group leaders.
2)Check for p->on_rq instead of p->state and cputime.
Preempted task in !TASK_RUNNING state OR just
created task may be queued, that we want to be
reported too.
3)Use read_lock() instead of
4 matches
Mail list logo
