On 12-05-20, 12:01, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There isn't any known implementation with more than one controller.
> > > > >
> > > > > But then it can come in "future" right. So lets try to make it future
> > > > > proof by not using the link_id (we can expose that as a
On 5/12/20 11:08 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 5/12/20 10:59 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 12-05-20, 09:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 5/11/20 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
+ md = >md;
+ md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
+ md->dev.type =
On 5/12/20 10:59 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 12-05-20, 09:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 5/11/20 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
+ md = >md;
+ md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
+ md->dev.type = _master_type;
+ md->dev.parent =
On 12-05-20, 09:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 5/11/20 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > > + md = >md;
> > > > > + md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
> > > > > + md->dev.type = _master_type;
> > > > > + md->dev.parent = parent;
> >
On 5/11/20 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
+ md = >md;
+ md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
+ md->dev.type = _master_type;
+ md->dev.parent = parent;
+ md->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
+ md->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
+
On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > + md = >md;
> > > + md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
> > > + md->dev.type = _master_type;
> > > + md->dev.parent = parent;
> > > + md->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
> > > + md->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
> > > + md->dev.dma_mask = parent->dma_mask;
> > > +
+ md = >md;
+ md->dev.bus = _bus_type;
+ md->dev.type = _master_type;
+ md->dev.parent = parent;
+ md->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
+ md->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
+ md->dev.dma_mask = parent->dma_mask;
+
+ dev_set_name(>dev, "sdw-master-%d",
naro.org;
> > > > rander.w...@linux.intel.com; ranjani.sridha...@linux.intel.com;
> > > > hui.w...@canonical.com; pierre- louis.boss...@linux.intel.com; Kale,
> > > > Sanyog R ; Blauciak, Slawomir
> > > > ; Lin, Mengdong
> > > > ; Liao, Bard
>
m;
> srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org; rander.w...@linux.intel.com;
> ranjani.sridha...@linux.intel.com; hui.w...@canonical.com; pierre-
> louis.boss...@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R ;
> Blauciak, Slawomir ; Lin, Mengdong
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus_type: add sdw_master_devic
Mengdong
> > ; Liao, Bard
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus_type: add sdw_master_device support
> >
> > On 30-04-20, 02:51, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > @@ -24,9 +24,14 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct
> > device *parent,
> >
@linaro.org; rander.w...@linux.intel.com;
> ranjani.sridha...@linux.intel.com; hui.w...@canonical.com; pierre-
> louis.boss...@linux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R ;
> Blauciak, Slawomir ; Lin, Mengdong
> ; Liao, Bard
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus_type: add sdw_master_device suppor
On 30-04-20, 02:51, Bard Liao wrote:
> @@ -24,9 +24,14 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct device
> *parent,
> struct sdw_master_prop *prop = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!bus->dev) {
> - pr_err("SoundWire bus has no device\n");
> - return
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart
In the existing SoundWire code, Master Devices are not explicitly
represented - only SoundWire Slave Devices are exposed (the use of
capital letters follows the SoundWire specification conventions).
The SoundWire Master Device provides the clock, synchronization
13 matches
Mail list logo
