Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Kiran Padwal
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 01:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: >> On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Two problems: >>> - I'm missing patches 1 and 2. > >> These patches are same like this one, >> [1]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: > On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Two problems: > > - I'm missing patches 1 and 2. > These patches are same like this one, > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/58 > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/52

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Kiran Padwal
On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: >> There is no need to init .owner field. >> >> Based on the patch from Peter Griffin >> "mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver" >> >> This patch

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Kiran Padwal
On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: There is no need to init .owner field. Based on the patch from Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver This

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Two problems: - I'm missing patches 1 and 2. These patches are same like this one, [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/58 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/52 You

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-14 Thread Kiran Padwal
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 01:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Two problems: - I'm missing patches 1 and 2. These patches are same like this one, [1]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: > There is no need to init .owner field. > > Based on the patch from Peter Griffin > "mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver" > > This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers which > use the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote: There is no need to init .owner field. Based on the patch from Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers

[PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-09 Thread Kiran Padwal
There is no need to init .owner field. Based on the patch from Peter Griffin "mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver" This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers which use the module_platform_driver API, as this is overridden in

[PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver

2014-10-09 Thread Kiran Padwal
There is no need to init .owner field. Based on the patch from Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers which use the module_platform_driver API, as this is overridden in