Re: [PATCH 3/3] ste_dma40: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in d40_probe()

2015-11-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:00:28 +0100 > > The variable "res" will eventually be set to a resource pointer from > a call of the d40_hw_detect_init(() function. > Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation at

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ste_dma40: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in d40_probe()

2015-11-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:00:28 +0100 > > The variable "res" will eventually be set to a resource pointer from > a call of the d40_hw_detect_init(()

[PATCH 3/3] ste_dma40: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in d40_probe()

2015-11-16 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:00:28 +0100 The variable "res" will eventually be set to a resource pointer from a call of the d40_hw_detect_init(() function. Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring ---

[PATCH 3/3] ste_dma40: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in d40_probe()

2015-11-16 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:00:28 +0100 The variable "res" will eventually be set to a resource pointer from a call of the d40_hw_detect_init(() function. Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. Signed-off-by: Markus