On 25 September 2012 23:26, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> +config MIGRATE_WQ
>> + bool "(EXPERIMENTAL) Migrate Workqueues to non-idle cpu"
>> + depends on SMP && EXPERIMENTAL
>> + help
>> + Workqueues queues work on current
On 25 September 2012 23:26, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+config MIGRATE_WQ
+ bool (EXPERIMENTAL) Migrate Workqueues to non-idle cpu
+ depends on SMP EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ Workqueues queues work on current
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +config MIGRATE_WQ
> + bool "(EXPERIMENTAL) Migrate Workqueues to non-idle cpu"
> + depends on SMP && EXPERIMENTAL
> + help
> + Workqueues queues work on current cpu, if the caller haven't passed a
> +
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > But this is what the initial idea during LPC we had.
>
> Yeah.. that's true.
>
> > Any improvements here you can suggest?
>
> We could uhm... /me tries thinking ... reuse some
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> But this is what the initial idea during LPC we had.
Yeah.. that's true.
> Any improvements here you can suggest?
We could uhm... /me tries thinking ... reuse some of the NOHZ magic?
Would that be sufficient, not waking a NOHZ cpu, or
On 25 September 2012 13:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 September 2012 16:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> @@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>>> struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> -
On 25 September 2012 16:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
>> struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ret = queue_work_on(get_cpu(), wq, work);
>> -
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> struct work_struct *work)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = queue_work_on(get_cpu(), wq, work);
> - put_cpu();
> + preempt_disable();
> + ret =
Workqueues queues work on current cpu, if the caller haven't passed a preferred
cpu. This may wake up an idle CPU, which is actually not required.
This work can be processed by any CPU and so we must select a non-idle CPU here.
This patch adds in support in workqueue framework to get preferred
Workqueues queues work on current cpu, if the caller haven't passed a preferred
cpu. This may wake up an idle CPU, which is actually not required.
This work can be processed by any CPU and so we must select a non-idle CPU here.
This patch adds in support in workqueue framework to get preferred
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
@@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int ret;
- ret = queue_work_on(get_cpu(), wq, work);
- put_cpu();
+ preempt_disable();
+ ret =
On 25 September 2012 16:52, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
@@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int ret;
- ret = queue_work_on(get_cpu(), wq, work);
-
On 25 September 2012 13:30, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 25 September 2012 16:52, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
@@ -1066,8 +1076,9 @@ int queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
But this is what the initial idea during LPC we had.
Yeah.. that's true.
Any improvements here you can suggest?
We could uhm... /me tries thinking ... reuse some of the NOHZ magic?
Would that be sufficient, not waking a NOHZ cpu, or do
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
But this is what the initial idea during LPC we had.
Yeah.. that's true.
Any improvements here you can suggest?
We could uhm... /me tries thinking ... reuse some of the
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+config MIGRATE_WQ
+ bool (EXPERIMENTAL) Migrate Workqueues to non-idle cpu
+ depends on SMP EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ Workqueues queues work on current cpu, if the caller haven't passed a
+ preferred
16 matches
Mail list logo
