On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:44:49AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> > if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->pool->gcwq->cpu != cpu);
> > atomic_inc(get_pool_nr_running(worker->pool));
> > }
> >
>
> I have no objection to do
2012/10/21 Tejun Heo :
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:30:07AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Commit 63d95a91 ('workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where
>> applicable') changes an approach to access nr_running.
>> Thus, wq_worker_waking_up() doesn't use @cpu anymore.
>> Remove it and remove c
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:30:07AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Commit 63d95a91 ('workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where
> applicable') changes an approach to access nr_running.
> Thus, wq_worker_waking_up() doesn't use @cpu anymore.
> Remove it and remove comment related to it.
>
> Si
Commit 63d95a91 ('workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where
applicable') changes an approach to access nr_running.
Thus, wq_worker_waking_up() doesn't use @cpu anymore.
Remove it and remove comment related to it.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sche
4 matches
Mail list logo
