Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, February 07, 2016 02:50:19 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 06-02-16, 04:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor > > work items, register a utilization update callback that will be > > invoked from

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 06-02-16, 04:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor > work items, register a utilization update callback that will be > invoked from the scheduler on utilization changes. > > The sampling rate is still the

[PATCH 3/3 v4] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor work items, register a utilization update callback that will be invoked from the scheduler on utilization changes. The sampling rate is still the same as what was used for the deferrable timers and the ad