On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:05 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:33 PM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/342
> > > > > Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
> > > > > ---
> > >
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:51 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> > This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
> > $LD but rather -fuse-ld=$(LD). This is problematic especially for
> > cc-ldoption,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:33 AM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 2:27 AM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:51 PM Nathan Chancellor
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> > > > This is needed
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:33 PM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
[ ... ]
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/342
> > > > Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
> > > > ---
> > > > Makefile | 3 +++
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 2:27 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:51 PM Nathan Chancellor
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> > > This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
> > > $LD but
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:27:19AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:51 PM Nathan Chancellor
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> > > This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
> > > $LD
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:51 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> > This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
> > $LD but rather -fuse-ld=$(LD). This is problematic especially for
> > cc-ldoption,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 03:21:15PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> why don't you simply check for CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD existing (when [1] applied)?
>
Hi Sedat,
This section runs before Kconfig so we can't rely on the symbols it
generates. See commit 995167420797 ("kbuild: remove cc-name
Hi Nick,
why don't you simply check for CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD existing (when [1] applied)?
If you want a specific version of ld.lld (you mentioned kernel module
linking failure was fixed recently) why not transfer this into a
scripts/lld-version.sh file?
Greetings,
- Sedat -
[1]
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:01:51PM -0800, ndesaulni...@google.com wrote:
> This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
> $LD but rather -fuse-ld=$(LD). This is problematic especially for
> cc-ldoption, which checks for linker flag support via invoking the
> compiler,
This is needed because clang doesn't select which linker to use based on
$LD but rather -fuse-ld=$(LD). This is problematic especially for
cc-ldoption, which checks for linker flag support via invoking the
compiler, rather than the linker.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/342
11 matches
Mail list logo
