Re: [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs

2012-07-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu wrote: > OK, but if your taking this patch through GPIO tree the better if the 4th > patch is taken through it. TCA6424 fails if both the patches are not > present. If the situation is such they should be squashed into one since the point

Re: [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs

2012-07-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote: > From: Leed Aguilar > > TCA6424 being a 24 bit I2C and SMBus I/O expander has 24 available GPIO lines > that can be used as IRQs lines. So, the support for 24 more IRQ lines has been > added to the kernel. > > Change-Id: I22e4fbb3a1e

[PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs

2012-07-10 Thread Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
From: Leed Aguilar TCA6424 being a 24 bit I2C and SMBus I/O expander has 24 available GPIO lines that can be used as IRQs lines. So, the support for 24 more IRQ lines has been added to the kernel. Change-Id: I22e4fbb3a1e4c4b53ae698a9b22cdb0f4ad7f4e6 Signed-off-by: Leed Aguilar Signed-off-by: Ch