On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:34 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
> > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
> > > 64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 3
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 8:03 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:44 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:59:04 PST (-0800), ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Pa
Hi Palmer,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:44 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:59:04 PST (-0800), ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (
Hi Atish,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:39 AM Atish Patra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-080
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:59:04 PST (-0800), ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Atish,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10
Hi Atish,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:11 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:5
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:11:14 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
> >> > SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:01 PST (-0800), ati...@atishpatra.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
> 64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:10 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
> > SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
> > 64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 32 bytes with each memblock
> > allocation if it is request
On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:26:51 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 32 bytes with each memblock
allocation if it is requested to be aligned with SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
-
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:57 PM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
> 64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 32 bytes with each memblock
> allocation if it is requested to be aligned with SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
L
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:28 AM Atish Patra wrote:
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
> 64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 32 bytes with each memblock
> allocation if it is requested to be aligned with SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
Te
SMP_CACHE_BYTES/L1_CACHE_BYTES should be defined as 32 instead of
64 for RV32. Otherwise, there will be hole of 32 bytes with each memblock
allocation if it is requested to be aligned with SMP_CACHE_BYTES.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h | 4
1 file changed, 4
15 matches
Mail list logo