On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:40:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Perhaps instead of unsigned long?
>
> bool skipped_ip; //delayed initialization
Ooh, I forgot we had bool. I'll fix that in a later patch.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:28 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> +unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + unsigned long stack_page, sp, ip, count = 0;
Perhaps instead of unsigned long?
bool skipped_ip;//delayed initialization
> +
> + if ((p == NULL) || (p == current) ||
Implement get_wchan - the algorithm is similar to x86. It starts with
the stack pointer of the process in question and looks above that for
addresses that are kernel text. The second one which isn't in the
scheduler is the one that's returned. The first one is ignored
because that will be UML's
Implement get_wchan - the algorithm is similar to x86. It starts with
the stack pointer of the process in question and looks above that for
addresses that are kernel text. The second one which isn't in the
scheduler is the one that's returned. The first one is ignored
because that will be UML's
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:28 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
+unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ unsigned long stack_page, sp, ip, count = 0;
Perhaps instead of unsigned long?
bool skipped_ip;//delayed initialization
+
+ if ((p == NULL) || (p == current) || (p-state
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:40:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Perhaps instead of unsigned long?
bool skipped_ip; //delayed initialization
Ooh, I forgot we had bool. I'll fix that in a later patch.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To
6 matches
Mail list logo
