On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I agree that converting the Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs would produce a
> > > lot of churn. But if some binding are common there is no file at all are
> > > in common, so we could use this solution for the 64 bits SoCs only.
> >
>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I agree that converting the Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs would produce a
> > > lot of churn. But if some binding are common there is no file at all are
> > > in common, so we could use this solution for the 64 bits SoCs only.
> >
>
> > I agree that converting the Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs would produce a
> > lot of churn. But if some binding are common there is no file at all are
> > in common, so we could use this solution for the 64 bits SoCs only.
>
> Yes, we could. I'm fine with it. I was merely pointing out that it
> > I agree that converting the Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs would produce a
> > lot of churn. But if some binding are common there is no file at all are
> > in common, so we could use this solution for the 64 bits SoCs only.
>
> Yes, we could. I'm fine with it. I was merely pointing out that it
Hello,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:27:27 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > We haven't used this solution on Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs, so there
> > needs to be a discussion on whether we want to go in this direction for
> > the 64 bits SoCs.
>
> At first view using the label helps to have simpler
Hello,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:27:27 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > We haven't used this solution on Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs, so there
> > needs to be a discussion on whether we want to go in this direction for
> > the 64 bits SoCs.
>
> At first view using the label helps to have simpler
Hi Thomas,
On jeu., mars 24 2016, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:24:20 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
>> adding labels where necessary.
>>
>> Drop some
Hi Thomas,
On jeu., mars 24 2016, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:24:20 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
>> adding labels where necessary.
>>
>> Drop some trailing or inconsistent white lines
Hello,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:24:20 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
> adding labels where necessary.
>
> Drop some trailing or inconsistent white lines while at it.
>
> Fixes: ec7e5a569bce ("arm64: dts: marvell: add Device
Hello,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:24:20 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
> adding labels where necessary.
>
> Drop some trailing or inconsistent white lines while at it.
>
> Fixes: ec7e5a569bce ("arm64: dts: marvell: add Device
Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
adding labels where necessary.
Drop some trailing or inconsistent white lines while at it.
Fixes: ec7e5a569bce ("arm64: dts: marvell: add Device Tree files for Armada
7K/8K")
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni
Instead of duplicating the node hierarchy, reference the nodes by label,
adding labels where necessary.
Drop some trailing or inconsistent white lines while at it.
Fixes: ec7e5a569bce ("arm64: dts: marvell: add Device Tree files for Armada
7K/8K")
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni
Signed-off-by: Andreas
12 matches
Mail list logo