Re: [PATCH 3/4] extcon: arizona: Update manual headphone detection calculation

2014-05-30 Thread Charles Keepax
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:27:35AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Charles, > > On 05/30/2014 12:27 AM, Charles Keepax wrote: > > The higher levels of impedance have a higher minimum value than the > > first level. As the same value was used for all levels, higher impedances > > were reported with

Re: [PATCH 3/4] extcon: arizona: Update manual headphone detection calculation

2014-05-29 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Charles, On 05/30/2014 12:27 AM, Charles Keepax wrote: > The higher levels of impedance have a higher minimum value than the > first level. As the same value was used for all levels, higher impedances > were reported with a very low level of accuracy. This patch applies the > approriate lower t

[PATCH 3/4] extcon: arizona: Update manual headphone detection calculation

2014-05-29 Thread Charles Keepax
The higher levels of impedance have a higher minimum value than the first level. As the same value was used for all levels, higher impedances were reported with a very low level of accuracy. This patch applies the approriate lower threshold for each level. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax --- drive