On 07/13/2016 12:00 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
From: Minchan Kim
Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
but if so, please preserve credit for Minchan.
When I
On 07/13/2016 12:00 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
From: Minchan Kim
Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
but if so, please preserve credit for Minchan.
When I tested vmscale in mmtest
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Minchan Kim
>
> Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
> mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
> but if so, please preserve credit for
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Minchan Kim
>
> Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
> mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
> but if so, please preserve credit for Minchan.
>
> When I
From: Minchan Kim
Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
but if so, please preserve credit for Minchan.
When I tested vmscale in mmtest in 32bit, I found the
From: Minchan Kim
Note from Mel: This may optionally be considered a fix to the mmotm patch
mm-page_alloc-consider-dirtyable-memory-in-terms-of-nodes.patch
but if so, please preserve credit for Minchan.
When I tested vmscale in mmtest in 32bit, I found the benchmark was slow
6 matches
Mail list logo