On Friday 13 May 2016 04:13 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
> eMMC. The exact value is dependent on the SoC and other factors, though
> it isn't really an exact science. But the default of 0 is not very good,
> as it doesn't give th
Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016, 15:43:05 schrieb Brian Norris:
> The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
> eMMC. The exact value is dependent on the SoC and other factors, though
> it isn't really an exact science. But the default of 0 is not very good,
> as it doesn't g
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
>
> On 2016/5/14 6:25, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Brian Norris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
>>> eMMC. The exact value is depen
Hi Doug,
On 2016/5/14 6:25, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
eMMC. The exact value is dependent on the SoC and other factors, though
it isn't really an exact science. But the de
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
> eMMC. The exact value is dependent on the SoC and other factors, though
> it isn't really an exact science. But the default of 0 is not very good,
> as it doesn't gi
The output tap delay controls helps maintain the hold requirements for
eMMC. The exact value is dependent on the SoC and other factors, though
it isn't really an exact science. But the default of 0 is not very good,
as it doesn't give the eMMC much hold time, so let's bump up to 4
(approx 90 degree
6 matches
Mail list logo