On 2025-06-21 06:14:21+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:39:32PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > The nolibc tests are not real kselftests, they work differently and
> > provide a different interface. Users trying to use them like real
> > selftests may be co
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 10:34:38AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-06-21 06:14:21+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:39:32PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > The nolibc tests are not real kselftests, they work differently and
> > > provide a d
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:39:32PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The nolibc tests are not real kselftests, they work differently and
> provide a different interface. Users trying to use them like real
> selftests may be confused and the tests are not executed by CI systems.
>
> To m
The nolibc tests are not real kselftests, they work differently and
provide a different interface. Users trying to use them like real
selftests may be confused and the tests are not executed by CI systems.
To make space for an integration with the kselftest framework, move the
custom tests out of
4 matches
Mail list logo
