Re: [PATCH 3/4] target: Drop se_lun->lun_active for existing percpu lun_ref

2015-05-22 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 05/22/2015 09:06 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > With se_port_t and t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member being absored into se_lun, > there is no need for an extra atomic_t based reference count for PR > ALL_TG_PT=1 and ALUA access state transition. > > Go ahead and use th

[PATCH 3/4] target: Drop se_lun->lun_active for existing percpu lun_ref

2015-05-22 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
From: Nicholas Bellinger With se_port_t and t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member being absored into se_lun, there is no need for an extra atomic_t based reference count for PR ALL_TG_PT=1 and ALUA access state transition. Go ahead and use the existing percpu se_lun->lun_ref instead, and convert the two spec