2014-09-25 21:11 GMT-06:00 Darren Hart :
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:24:27PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
>> Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
>> the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
>> returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
>>
>> This patch changes such
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:24:27PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
> the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
> returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
>
> This patch changes such functions, returning the value
> of the HCI/SCI
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:24:27PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
This patch changes such functions, returning the value
of the HCI/SCI function
2014-09-25 21:11 GMT-06:00 Darren Hart dvh...@infradead.org:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:24:27PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
This patch changes
Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
This patch changes such functions, returning the value
of the HCI/SCI function instead of the ACPI call status.
The next patch will change all the
Currently the HCI/SCI read/write functions are returning
the status of the ACPI call and also assigning the
returned value of the HCI/SCI function.
This patch changes such functions, returning the value
of the HCI/SCI function instead of the ACPI call status.
The next patch will change all the
6 matches
Mail list logo