Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:00:14PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Catalin Marinas > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: > >> The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either > >> the compat or even the

Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:00:14PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either the compat

Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-11 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either >> the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some >> of the code path that

Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-11 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: > The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either > the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some > of the code path that are used as the size of the timespec is the > same, so this

Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-11 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some of the code path that are used as the size of the timespec is the same, so this patch

Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-11 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some of the

[PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-09 Thread Andrew Pinski
Hi, The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some of the code path that are used as the size of the timespec is the same, so this patch exports poll_select_copy_remaining from fs/select.c and renames

[PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.

2013-09-09 Thread Andrew Pinski
Hi, The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some of the code path that are used as the size of the timespec is the same, so this patch exports poll_select_copy_remaining from fs/select.c and renames