On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > Alright... send it out then.
>
> Workin' on it! :)
>
> > Also, do you know which branch Jens has his patches in?
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=6b6723fc3e4f24dbd80526df935ca115ead578c6
>
>
> Alright... send it out then.
Workin' on it! :)
> Also, do you know which branch Jens has his patches in?
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=6b6723fc3e4f24dbd80526df935ca115ead578c6
https://plus.google.com/111643045511375507360/posts
As far as I know, he hasn't had a chance
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:27:55AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:39:18PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
> > struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
> > them and ctx->dead).
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:39:18PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
> struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
> them and ctx->dead).
>
> Now, reqs_active holds a refcount on users (when reqs_active is
The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
them and ctx->dead).
Now, reqs_active holds a refcount on users (when reqs_active is
nonzero), and the initial refcount is taken on reqs_active - when
The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
them and ctx-dead).
Now, reqs_active holds a refcount on users (when reqs_active is
nonzero), and the initial refcount is taken on reqs_active - when
ctx-dead
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:39:18PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
them and ctx-dead).
Now, reqs_active holds a refcount on users (when reqs_active is
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:27:55AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:39:18PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
The refcounting before wasn't very clear; there are two refcounts in
struct kioctx, with an unclear relationship between them (or between
them and ctx-dead).
Alright... send it out then.
Workin' on it! :)
Also, do you know which branch Jens has his patches in?
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=6b6723fc3e4f24dbd80526df935ca115ead578c6
https://plus.google.com/111643045511375507360/posts
As far as I know, he hasn't had a chance to
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Alright... send it out then.
Workin' on it! :)
Also, do you know which branch Jens has his patches in?
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=6b6723fc3e4f24dbd80526df935ca115ead578c6
10 matches
Mail list logo
