On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 13:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > From: Jens Taprogge
> >
> > The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem
> > to
> > have any real use. The number is written to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> From: Jens Taprogge
>
> The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem to
> have any real use. The number is written to hardware in ipoctal but it seems
> the value that is written does not
From: Jens Taprogge
The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem to
have any real use. The number is written to hardware in ipoctal but it seems
the value that is written does not matter.
Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
---
From: Jens Taprogge jens.tapro...@taprogge.org
The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem to
have any real use. The number is written to hardware in ipoctal but it seems
the value that is written does not matter.
Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
From: Jens Taprogge jens.tapro...@taprogge.org
The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem to
have any real use. The number is written to hardware in ipoctal but it seems
the value that
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 13:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
From: Jens Taprogge jens.tapro...@taprogge.org
The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem
to
have any real use. The
6 matches
Mail list logo
