On Saturday 28 November 2015 21:13:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The fact that we were calling focaltech_init() even when Focaltech support
> is disabled was confusing. Rearrange the code so that if support is
> disabled we continue to fall through the rest of protocol probing code
> until we get to
On Saturday 28 November 2015 21:13:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The fact that we were calling focaltech_init() even when Focaltech support
> is disabled was confusing. Rearrange the code so that if support is
> disabled we continue to fall through the rest of protocol probing code
> until we get to
The fact that we were calling focaltech_init() even when Focaltech support
is disabled was confusing. Rearrange the code so that if support is
disabled we continue to fall through the rest of protocol probing code
until we get to full reset that Focaltech devices need to work properly.
Also,
The fact that we were calling focaltech_init() even when Focaltech support
is disabled was confusing. Rearrange the code so that if support is
disabled we continue to fall through the rest of protocol probing code
until we get to full reset that Focaltech devices need to work properly.
Also,
4 matches
Mail list logo