Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Decouple checker from generic ARM CPUidle

2019-08-07 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 22/07/2019 17:37, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The PSCI checker currently relies on the generic ARM CPUidle > infrastructure to enter an idle state, which in turn creates > a dependency that is not really needed. > > The PSCI checker code to test PSCI CPU suspend is built on > top of the CPUidle

Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Decouple checker from generic ARM CPUidle

2019-08-06 Thread Sudeep Holla
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The PSCI checker currently relies on the generic ARM CPUidle > infrastructure to enter an idle state, which in turn creates > a dependency that is not really needed. > > The PSCI checker code to test PSCI CPU suspend is built on

[PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Decouple checker from generic ARM CPUidle

2019-07-22 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
The PSCI checker currently relies on the generic ARM CPUidle infrastructure to enter an idle state, which in turn creates a dependency that is not really needed. The PSCI checker code to test PSCI CPU suspend is built on top of the CPUidle framework and can easily reuse the struct