On 15 August 2015 at 01:04, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 14/08/15 17:23, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -2596,7 +2597,7 @@ __update_load_avg(u64 now, int cpu, struct sched_avg
>> *sa,
>> }
>> }
>> if (running)
On 14/08/15 17:23, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Dietmar Eggemann
[...]
> @@ -2596,7 +2597,7 @@ __update_load_avg(u64 now, int cpu, struct sched_avg
> *sa,
> }
> }
> if (running)
> - sa->util_sum += scaled_delta_w;
> +
From: Dietmar Eggemann
Besides the existing frequency scale-invariance correction factor, apply
cpu scale-invariance correction factor to utilization tracking to
compensate for any differences in compute capacity. This could be due to
micro-architectural differences (i.e. instructions per seconds
3 matches
Mail list logo