Re: [PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively

2013-10-03 Thread takasi-y
Hi Laurent, > While I agree with this patch, I believe the use of the HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV > configuration option to select whether to compile core.o in is a bit of an > abuse. Well, yes, indeed. It does not mean having include/mach/clkdev.h, but means somewhat such like !COMMON_CLK. # I think ther

Re: [PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively

2013-10-01 Thread Magnus Damm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, wrote: > Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and > set it > - y on sh for backward compatibility > - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile > This is a preparation for migration to common clock framework > from sh clock framework on sh-mobile. > > Si

Re: [PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively

2013-09-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Yoshii-san, Thank you for the patch. On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:12:06 takas...@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote: > Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and > set it > - y on sh for backward compatibility > - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile > This is a preparation for migration to c

[PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively

2013-09-23 Thread takasi-y
Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and set it - y on sh for backward compatibility - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile This is a preparation for migration to common clock framework from sh clock framework on sh-mobile. Signed-off-by: Takashi Yoshii --- arch/arm/Kconfig