Hi Laurent,
> While I agree with this patch, I believe the use of the HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
> configuration option to select whether to compile core.o in is a bit of an
> abuse.
Well, yes, indeed. It does not mean having include/mach/clkdev.h,
but means somewhat such like !COMMON_CLK.
# I think ther
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, wrote:
> Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and
> set it
> - y on sh for backward compatibility
> - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile
> This is a preparation for migration to common clock framework
> from sh clock framework on sh-mobile.
>
> Si
Hi Yoshii-san,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:12:06 takas...@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote:
> Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and
> set it
> - y on sh for backward compatibility
> - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile
> This is a preparation for migration to c
Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and
set it
- y on sh for backward compatibility
- !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile
This is a preparation for migration to common clock framework
from sh clock framework on sh-mobile.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Yoshii
---
arch/arm/Kconfig
4 matches
Mail list logo