On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
> variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
> and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be used after
> the
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
> variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
> and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be used after
>
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be
From: Julia Lawall
If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be used after
the end of the iterator. The patch replaces s->name by
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the iterator
variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from the list head,
and not a meaningful structure. Thus this value should not be used after
the end of the iterator. The patch
6 matches
Mail list logo