On 25/02/15 18:23, Robert Abel wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 25 Feb 2015 17:18, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to
>> of_platform_decide_create() behaves
>> for your case.
> I'm not able to test today, so results will be in tomorrow. If that doesn't
>
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 17:18, Roger Quadros wrote:
OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to
of_platform_decide_create() behaves
for your case.
I'm not able to test today, so results will be in tomorrow. If that
doesn't work, I'll just resubmit my first patch with the
Robert,
On 25/02/15 17:06, Robert Abel wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 25 Feb 2015 13:02, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> This creates platform devices for the children of child, but what about
>> platform device for the child itself?
> It seems my first try in the other patch set wasn't so wrong after all.
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 13:02, Roger Quadros wrote:
This creates platform devices for the children of child, but what
about platform device for the child itself?
It seems my first try in the other patch set wasn't so wrong after all.
Maybe unconditionally call
Robert,
On 24/02/15 22:05, Robert ABEL wrote:
> This patch adds support for spawning busses as children of the GPMC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
Robert,
On 24/02/15 22:05, Robert ABEL wrote:
This patch adds support for spawning busses as children of the GPMC.
Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL ra...@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Robert,
On 25/02/15 17:06, Robert Abel wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 13:02, Roger Quadros wrote:
This creates platform devices for the children of child, but what about
platform device for the child itself?
It seems my first try in the other patch set wasn't so wrong after all. Maybe
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 13:02, Roger Quadros wrote:
This creates platform devices for the children of child, but what
about platform device for the child itself?
It seems my first try in the other patch set wasn't so wrong after all.
Maybe unconditionally call
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 17:18, Roger Quadros wrote:
OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to
of_platform_decide_create() behaves
for your case.
I'm not able to test today, so results will be in tomorrow. If that
doesn't work, I'll just resubmit my first patch with the
On 25/02/15 18:23, Robert Abel wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 25 Feb 2015 17:18, Roger Quadros wrote:
OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to
of_platform_decide_create() behaves
for your case.
I'm not able to test today, so results will be in tomorrow. If that doesn't
work, I'll
This patch adds support for spawning busses as children of the GPMC.
Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
index 5cabac8..78b78a64 100644
---
This patch adds support for spawning busses as children of the GPMC.
Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL ra...@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
index
12 matches
Mail list logo
