[PATCH 3/9] NFS: use locks_copy_lock() to copy locks.

[NeilBrown]

Using memcpy() to copy lock requests leave the various
list_head in an inconsistent state.
As we will soon attach a list of conflicting request to
another pending request, we need these lists to be consistent.
So change NFS to use locks_init_lock/locks_copy_lock instead
of memcpy.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 8220a168282e..cd5a431c6583 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6284,7 +6284,8 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata 
*nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
        /* Ensure we don't close file until we're done freeing locks! */
        p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
        p->l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
-       memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl));
+       locks_init_lock(&p->fl);
+       locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl);
        p->server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
        return p;
 }
@@ -6506,7 +6507,8 @@ static struct nfs4_lockdata *nfs4_alloc_lockdata(struct 
file_lock *fl,
        p->server = server;
        refcount_inc(&lsp->ls_count);
        p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
-       memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl));
+       locks_init_lock(&p->fl);
+       locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl);
        return p;
 out_free_seqid:
        nfs_free_seqid(p->arg.open_seqid);