Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:56:25PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/06/2017 02:48 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > An updated patch was pushed here : > > > > > > > > > > > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-rev

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 02/06/2017 02:48 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: An updated patch was pushed here : https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc2.gz Better, but unfortunately there is now a different build error. Build

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:48:03PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > An updated patch was pushed here : > > > > > > > > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc2.gz > > > > > > > Better, but unf

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > An updated patch was pushed here : > > > > > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc2.gz > > > > Better, but unfortunately there is now a different build error. > > Build results: > to

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/06/2017 12:13 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. > > > > > > NOTE! This series is quite large

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 02/06/2017 12:13 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes that were submitted for -stable long ago

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. > > NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes > that were submitted for -stable long ago and that I had been holding on > since 3

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Guenter, On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 07:12:58PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/05/2017 11:09 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. > > > > NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes > > that were sub

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 02/05/2017 11:09 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes that were submitted for -stable long ago and that I had been holding on since 3.10.103 due to limited tim

[PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

2017-02-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release. NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes that were submitted for -stable long ago and that I had been holding on since 3.10.103 due to limited time. Most fixes address stability issues in crypt