On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 01/10/2015, 06:01 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Hugh Dickins
> > >>
> > >> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any obje
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/10/2015, 06:01 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> >> From: Hugh Dickins
> >>
> >> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> >> know.
> >>
> >> ===
>
On 01/10/2015, 06:01 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> From: Hugh Dickins
>>
>> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> commit f72e7dcdd25229446b102e587ef2f826f76bff28 upstream.
...
> Fine for this
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> From: Hugh Dickins
>
> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ===
>
> commit f72e7dcdd25229446b102e587ef2f826f76bff28 upstream.
>
> Trinity has reported:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL po
From: Hugh Dickins
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===
commit f72e7dcdd25229446b102e587ef2f826f76bff28 upstream.
Trinity has reported:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0018
IP: __lock_acquire
5 matches
Mail list logo