3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pekon Gupta <pe...@ti.com>
commit aa6092f9835893290e77c3e24649def49dac1583 upstream.
1) In current implementation, ecclayout->oobfree->offset is calculated with
respect to ecclayout->eccpos[0] which is incorrect because ECC bytes may not
be stored contiguously in OOB.
So, this patch calculates ecclayout->oobfree->offset with respect to last
ECC byte-position 'eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes-1]'.
2) ECC layout of some ecc-schemes expects reserved-markers at specific eccpos[]
which should not be over-written by any file-system metadata.
So this patch aligns oobfree->offset taking into account of such markers.
Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballe...@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pe...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -1838,8 +1838,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platfo
oob_index = 1;
for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
- ecclayout->eccbytes;
+ /* no reserved-marker in ecclayout for this ecc-scheme */
+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
break;
case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:
@@ -1862,8 +1863,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platfo
if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
oob_index++;
}
- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
- ecclayout->eccbytes;
+ /* include reserved-marker in ecclayout->oobfree calculation */
+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset = 1 +
+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
nand_chip->ecc.priv = nand_bch_init(mtd,
nand_chip->ecc.size,
@@ -1900,8 +1902,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platfo
oob_index = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
- ecclayout->eccbytes;
+ /* reserved marker already included in ecclayout->eccbytes */
+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
/* This ECC scheme requires ELM H/W block */
if (is_elm_present(info, pdata->elm_of_node, BCH4_ECC) < 0) {
pr_err("nand: error: could not initialize ELM\n");
@@ -1935,8 +1938,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platfo
if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
oob_index++;
}
- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
- ecclayout->eccbytes;
+ /* include reserved-marker in ecclayout->oobfree calculation */
+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset = 1 +
+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
nand_chip->ecc.priv = nand_bch_init(mtd,
nand_chip->ecc.size,
@@ -1980,8 +1984,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platfo
oob_index = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
- ecclayout->eccbytes;
+ /* reserved marker already included in ecclayout->eccbytes */
+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
break;
#else
pr_err("nand: error: CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_BCH not enabled\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
