On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:58:41AM +0200, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > Hi Kamal,
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:10:30AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our
> > extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at
> > kernel.org?
>
> Hi, from 3.12.y, for
On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our
> extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at
> kernel.org?
Hi, from 3.12.y, for example:
commit 48e8cad86bb1241c08bdaa80db022c25068ff8e0
Author: Jiri Slaby
On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our
extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at
kernel.org?
Hi, from 3.12.y, for example:
commit 48e8cad86bb1241c08bdaa80db022c25068ff8e0
Author: Jiri Slaby
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:10:30AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our
extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at
kernel.org?
Hi, from 3.12.y, for example:
commit
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:58:41AM +0200, Luis Henriques wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Kamal,
> > >
> > > [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
On Thu,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Kamal,
> >
> > [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > >
Hi Kamal,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > This one (and the accompanying revert) are still not present in more
> > recent stable kernels, so I find it surprizing that you're proposing
> > to integrate them now.
>
> I can hold out those lzo fixes until the next
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
>
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
> >
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
me know.
Hi Kamal,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
This one (and the accompanying revert) are still not present in more
recent stable kernels, so I find it surprizing that you're proposing
to integrate them now.
I can hold out those lzo fixes until the next
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
3.13.11.9
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
>
> --
>
> From: Willy Tarreau
>
> commit
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Willy Tarreau
commit 72cf90124e87d975d0b2114d930808c58b4c05e4 upstream.
This fix ensures that we never meet an integer overflow while adding
255 while parsing a variable length
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
commit 72cf90124e87d975d0b2114d930808c58b4c05e4 upstream.
This fix ensures that we never meet an integer overflow while adding
255 while parsing a variable
Hi Kamal,
[ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
18 matches
Mail list logo