Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:58:41AM +0200, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Luis Henriques
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:10:30AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > > Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our > > extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at > > kernel.org? > > Hi, from 3.12.y, for

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our > extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at > kernel.org? Hi, from 3.12.y, for example: commit 48e8cad86bb1241c08bdaa80db022c25068ff8e0 Author: Jiri Slaby

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at kernel.org? Hi, from 3.12.y, for example: commit 48e8cad86bb1241c08bdaa80db022c25068ff8e0 Author: Jiri Slaby

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Luis Henriques
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:10:30AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 10/14/2014, 10:58 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: Could you please provide us with examples of commits in one of our extended stable trees that is not on any other public release at kernel.org? Hi, from 3.12.y, for example: commit

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:58:41AM +0200, Luis Henriques wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Kamal, [ removed Don

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-14 Thread Luis Henriques
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > > > [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] >

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-14 Thread Luis Henriques
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:52:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Kamal, [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] On Thu,

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Kamal, > > > > [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] > > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Kamal, On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > This one (and the accompanying revert) are still not present in more > > recent stable kernels, so I find it surprizing that you're proposing > > to integrate them now. > > I can hold out those lzo fixes until the next

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Kamal Mostafa
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Kamal, > > [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > >

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Kamal Mostafa
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Kamal, [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Kamal, On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: This one (and the accompanying revert) are still not present in more recent stable kernels, so I find it surprizing that you're proposing to integrate them now. I can hold out those lzo fixes until the next

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:31:03AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:30 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Kamal, [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: 3.13.11.9

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Kamal, [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > -- > > From: Willy Tarreau > > commit

[PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-09 Thread Kamal Mostafa
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Willy Tarreau commit 72cf90124e87d975d0b2114d930808c58b4c05e4 upstream. This fix ensures that we never meet an integer overflow while adding 255 while parsing a variable length

[PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-09 Thread Kamal Mostafa
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu commit 72cf90124e87d975d0b2114d930808c58b4c05e4 upstream. This fix ensures that we never meet an integer overflow while adding 255 while parsing a variable

Re: [PATCH 3.13 163/163] lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Kamal, [ removed Don Bailey from the CC who's certainly not interested in this ] On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: 3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu