On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I've found regression:
>
> [ 257.139907]
> [ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
> [ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
> [
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
I've found regression:
[ 257.139907]
[ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
[ 257.139914]
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> I've found regression:
>>
>> [ 257.139907]
>> [ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
>>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:49:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, nice, I missed that one.
>
> Ugh, to be fair, I missed it too.
>
> The alternative to backporting 7fb08eca4527 is to make the backport of
> commit
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> Ah, nice, I missed that one.
Ugh, to be fair, I missed it too.
The alternative to backporting 7fb08eca4527 is to make the backport of
commit 33692f27597f use "bad_area()" instead of
"bad_area_nosemaphore()".
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I've found regression:
>
> [ 257.139907]
> [ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
> [ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
> [
I've found regression:
[ 257.139907]
[ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
[ 257.139914]
[ 257.139916] python/22843 is
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Ah, nice, I missed that one.
Ugh, to be fair, I missed it too.
The alternative to backporting 7fb08eca4527 is to make the backport of
commit 33692f27597f use bad_area() instead of
bad_area_nosemaphore().
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
I've found regression:
[ 257.139907]
[ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
[ 257.139914]
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:49:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Ah, nice, I missed that one.
Ugh, to be fair, I missed it too.
The alternative to backporting 7fb08eca4527 is to make the backport of
I've found regression:
[ 257.139907]
[ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[ 257.139912] 3.18.6-debug+ #161 Tainted: G U
[ 257.139914]
[ 257.139916] python/22843 is
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
I've found regression:
[ 257.139907]
[ 257.139909] [ BUG: lock held when returning to
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds
commit 33692f27597fcab536d7cbbcc8f52905133e4aa7 upstream.
The core VM already knows about VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, but cannot return a
"you should SIGSEGV" error, because the SIGSEGV
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
commit 33692f27597fcab536d7cbbcc8f52905133e4aa7 upstream.
The core VM already knows about VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, but cannot return a
you should SIGSEGV
14 matches
Mail list logo